Here is a summary of our home circle.
Home circle held 21st March 2023.
Hi and Welcome to my Blog!
Every physical seance is different but there are important preparations which remain the same. A room is designated for the investigation into a physical seance and this is because it can be separate and closed off during the set and scheduled process. Seating is all positioned so as each member can see one another and fully observe all objects that are placed on a centrally situated table.
Each investigation into a physical seance is held in a closed room. Experienced members and medium gathered together and sat in fully visible positions to each other and all the objects in the room.
The medium relayed information about what she could note in the seance about individuals in spirit and associated details.
ORBS noted, could be depicted as small, blue and round unexplained lights that were seen momentarily and were unexplained by any other environment or person based cause from inside or outside of the seance room at that time.
MESSAGES were then given and these included personality information, details about individual preferences and memories.
A lot of laughter could be heard as a very conversational type of exchange occurred. Individuals in spirit talked with loved ones via the medium. There was a relaxed tone and a lot of personal detail in the minutes that were collectively experienced.
The medium referred to someone thought to be a Sir Peter Alexander Ustinov(born Peter Alexander Freiherr von Ustinov 16 April 1921 – 28 March 2004) a British actor, writer and filmmaker. An internationally known raconteur, he was a fixture on television and a lot of talk shows. He taught and lectured circuits. An intellectual and diplomat, he held academic posts and she served as a goodwill ambassador for UNICEF and as president of the World Federalist Movement. In the seance the gentleman talked about a birthday anniversary and a love for the outdoors. He mentioned a garden and celebrating an anniversary there.
SUMMARY of the experiences and events led to discussion about what had occurred. Members could validate what had been received by them in terms of messages and acknowledge the specific context. This was useful as it helped to unify what had been classed as evidence and why it had such significance behind it.