Here is a summary of our home circle.
Home circle held 8th January 2019.
A physical séance has observational requirements in terms of the activity that might be noted and investigated as for explanation. In a physical activity, the overt activity such as visual and audio based experiences, are primary areas for further questioning and investigation.
In the séance there was a lot of noted activity from the first few minutes. Speech started to flow from specific spirits to particular sitters via the medium, who was in trance. The speech did differ considerably according to speakers and personal messages appeared to engage the members in the séance. The information was quite private but was later confirmed and validated as verifiable and correct by the relevant recipients.
Orbs were noted. These were small, circular blue lights that seen for a few seconds each, could not be explained as for anything having caused them from inside or outside of the room where the séance was held. The timing of them was discussed and that was because the Orbs were each noticed just prior or post a spirit being referred to and spoken about. On one prominent occasion, the blue Orb, was seen in front of a pertinent photograph to the spirit who was speaking at the time. This was thought of as potential evidence because of the photographic and speech based incidents.
The medium talked about a male in spirit, depiction of his appearance was given and references made about someone believed to be a William Clark Gable (February 1, 1901 – November 16, 1960) an American film actor and a military officer. Research has shown that he began his career appearing as an extra in silent films between 1924 and 1926, and progressed to supporting roles. He later acted with a few films for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer in 1930. The next year, he landed his first leading Hollywood role, and over the next three decades, he was a leading man in more than 60 motion pictures. In the séance the male in spirit talked about his grandchildren particularly and then about an anniversary.
The séance was keen to discuss what had been experienced. Apart from the Orbs, individuals felt that the moments of message giving were relevant and meaningful. Both the phrasing of the specific spirits, when used in conversations to corresponding members, and the particulars were acknowledged by the recipients as extremely pertinent. The messages were subjective but evidence was taken from, spoken of, fact-based information. It was important for the séance to investigate as experiences were mentioned and noted. It was a useful way to dismiss and focus on possible causes or contributors for the activity that had been noted. The one specific visual activity of the Orbs could be significantly ruled out as for having been a result of any means of physical cause from the séance room itself.